PG Calc Featured Articles

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) reshapes many aspects of tax planning. How these changes will affect donor behavior remains to be seen. For fundraisers, understanding the key changes – when they start, when they end, and how they’ll affect your donors – is critical to informing fundraising strategies and messages.

Most of the provisions of the OBBBA with significant potential impact on charitable giving take effect beginning in 2026 and, importantly, many of the charitable provisions are permanent and do not sunset. These changes provide a new, but complex, basis for charitable gift planning.

Here is a breakdown of several key provisions and their potential implications for donors . . .

Charitable giving totaled $592.5 billion last year according to research conducted by the Lilly School of Philanthropy and published in Giving USA, The Annual Report on Philanthropy for the Year 2024. This is the first annual increase since 2021, when a record $643.8 billion was contributed, and represents a 3.3% increase over 2023 after inflation. Nearly three quarters of all giving was from individuals, including $392.5 billion in current giving and $45.8 in bequests, while giving from foundations was $109.8 billion and corporate giving totaled $44.4 billion.

Beyond the broad totals, the Giving USA report points to some interesting trends . . .

On July 4th, President Trump signed into law HR 1, the “One Big Beautiful Bill” (OBBB). While technically a tax bill, the OBBB implements significant elements of the President’s second-term agenda including making permanent most of his 2017 tax cuts, which were set to expire at the end of 2025. Although the financial and tax impact on donors will vary, there is little in the OBBB that directly affects charitable gift planning, and the bill does not include many legislative priorities championed by the charitable sector.

Here is a summary of a few key individual taxpayer provisions of the OBBB along with some observations about the impact they could have on your work with donors.

Breaking News:

Late Monday, June 16, 2025, the Senate Finance Committee released its proposed revisions to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Among the proposed changes are:

• Increase and make permanent the non-itemizer charitable deduction to $1,000 for individuals and $2,000 for joint filers.
• Add a 0.5% floor on the charitable deduction for individuals who itemize (designed to offset the cost of the non-itemizer charitable deduction).
• Permanently extend the increased 60% AGI cap on the charitable deduction for cash contributions.
• Remove the increased net investment income tax on private foundations.
• Reduce the excise tax on investment income of private colleges and universities to:
  • $500,000 - $750,000 per student – 1.4% (same as House)
  • $750,000 - $2 million per student – 4%
  • More than $2 million per student – 8%
    (Note that “student” includes US citizens only)

Bear in mind, the Senate still must vote on the proposed legislation, and then the Senate and House versions will need to be reconciled. The majority are still pushing to pass the final bill before the July 4th holiday. In other words: “Stay tuned!”

Just after sunrise on May 22, 2025, the House of Representatives passed HR 1, “The One Big Beautiful Bill Act” by a vote of 215 to 214. Now, the Senate is considering the 1,038-page bill and proposing changes which will go back to the House for further consideration. Under the regular order, this back-and-forth process will continue until both chambers reach agreement on a final bill which then goes to the President for signature. The Administration’s announced ambition is to sign the bill into law by Independence Day.

We’re still a long way from knowing exactly what might be signed into law. Nevertheless, here is a summary of some of the provisions – as passed by the House – that could affect charitable giving.

We frequently hear about so-called “underwater gift annuities” from our clients. We’re talking about those charitable gift annuities (CGAs) that were established many years ago – by donors with the best of intentions – but for which, over the years, the annuity payments have used up all the gift principal. The annuitant (who is frequently the donor) has probably lived well past his or her original life expectancy, but the sponsoring charity is still obligated to continue making annuity payments for as long as the annuitant is still alive. In case there is any question, there is absolutely zero chance of the charity ever receiving any residuum from that gift. And rest assured, this is not an unusual occurrence. We hear this same sad story again and again.

How did this happen? How did we end up in these unpleasant circumstances? And more specifically, what is to be done now? How does the sponsoring charity manage the situation going forward? And does the charity have any options at this point?

The Internal Revenue Service defines a private letter ruling, or PLR, as a statement issued to a taxpayer that interprets and applies tax laws to the taxpayer's specific set of facts. A PLR is issued to establish with certainty the federal tax consequences of the applicant’s tax question, and the findings are binding on the IRS. The resolution of the tax question in the requested PLR may not be relied on by other taxpayers. The PLRs are generally made public after the taxpayer’s identifying information has been removed from the document.

PLRs are important to planned giving to understand innovative gift planning opportunities. Although the PLRs are not binding on other taxpayers, donors and their advisors have a better understanding of how the IRS would rule when presented with a case with the same facts. While other donors may not rely on private letter rulings, certain unique planned giving options are now more common based on the PLR outcomes, such as flexible and step gift annuities, reinsured charitable gift annuities, commuted payment gift annuities, and more.

Last year at this time, we were talking about how well traditional investment portfolios had done in 2023. After a truly disastrous performance in 2022, the stock market came roaring back in 2023, and the bond side held its own. Long-term performance averages seemed reliable again, and investors regained their confidence. So how did traditional investment portfolios do in 2024? As it turns out, they did quite well. Roughly speaking, the investment performance for traditional investment portfolios in 2024 was a repeat of the robust performance in 2023. Let’s take a look at some of the details.

You’re preparing an illustration, or maybe a marketing piece, and want to show the potential tax savings – both income and capital gains – from a planned gift. You’ll need to make several assumptions including the gift amount, ages, and tax rates. For the first two, gift amount and ages, you can be guided by what you know about your prospect or, for a marketing piece, your intended target market. But how are you going to select the tax rates?

It’s certainly appealing to show the largest possible tax savings, which argues in favor of using the highest possible tax rates: 37% for income tax and 20% for capital gains. (And you might even choose 40.8% for the income tax rate, because it’s conceivable that the 3.8% Net Income Investment Tax Surcharge might apply.)

Here’s the rub: very few taxpayers fall into the 37% tax bracket. Even fewer also fall into the 20% capital gains bracket. 

The Qualified Charitable Distribution (“QCD”) from traditional IRAs is not new; it has been around since 2007. The Tax Act of 2006 ushered in this unique provision that allows distributions from traditional IRAs made directly to charities to escape the normal income tax on money taken out of a retirement plan. The donor is allowed to exclude the amount of the QCD from taxable income, but the offset is that there is no charitable income tax deduction for the gift being made to charity.

There has been confusion about the QCD ever since 2007, because it deals with aspects of IRAs that many are unfamiliar with. The biggest area of confusion has been distinguishing the RMD for a traditional IRA from a QCD. They are not the same thing. Not at all. And it is dangerous to confuse the two.

As they reshape philanthropy, the Millennial and Gen Z generations are prioritizing social impact, embracing technology, and seeking innovative ways to engage in their giving. A report, Shaping Tomorrow: How Gen Z and Millennials View Charitable Giving, based upon a survey conducted by Foundation Source, offers new insights.

These generations proactively seek opportunities to give back through a wide range of charitable activities based upon values and attitudes shaped by the tumultuous years during which they grew up. They are determined to play a role in communities they care about, believe they have an obligation to make an impact, and are ready to get to work!